Clutter data
This post is not intended to trend or do wonders for my SEO or your attention span, but I want it here as a record. You see, I have undergrads in biology, psychology, and journalism, so I’ve been trained to cite my sources. Which is why, when I say things like “clutter increases levels of the stress hormone cortisol!” there’s always a part of me that feels like I need to prove what I say instead of having you take my word for it. My intention is to use digestible snippets of this post in my social media and elsewhere, and to simply link back here where I cite my sources for anyone who is interested. And if you’re into data, this post is for you too!
“Clutter is a) too much stuff in too small a space; b) anything you no longer use or love; or c) anything that leads to a feeling of disorganization.”
1 – The effects of clutter on cortisol for women
Let’s start with that study I just mentioned, the one from UCLA in 2010. We know that “people's experiences and perceptions of their everyday environments can inform their well-being.” This study was looking specifically at cortisol. A high level of cortisol has “been associated with greater chronic stress, disease progression, and even mortality risk” and “specifically linked with greater psychological distress including symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, poor coping skills, a perceived lack of social support, and compromised relationship functioning.” (Some people report lower satisfaction in their relationships because of misunderstandings, stress, avoidance, and feeling isolated.) Moreover, women living in cluttered homes reported an increase in depressed mood as the day wore on, but for those living in a restorative home, the opposite was true. It was also noted that men’s stress decreases after their workday, but women’s stress tends to stay the same or increase, because they view their obligations at home as stressful. The clutter is a visual reminder of those obligations.
“The results of this study suggest that women's descriptions of their homes may predict their everyday experiences of stress and negative mood. Wives who described their homes as being more stressful (that is, who talked more about clutter and unfinished projects) had marginally lower marital satisfaction. Wives who described their homes as more stressful also had […] an indicator of chronic stress that has been linked with adverse health outcomes. They also tended to show greater increases in depressed mood across the day, consistent with greater fatigue in the evening and a more difficult transition from work to home.” No wonder they say they’re overwhelmed!
“Our largely null results for husbands, contrasted with significant results for wives, suggest that women may be more sensitive to the home environment or may feel a greater sense of responsibility for the home (for example, feeling guilty about clutter); this finding would be consistent with other research suggesting that the home is traditionally perceived as women's domain and ultimate responsibility, even in couples where both partners are employed.” (Women actually do tend to be judged more harshly – see point 2 below.)
We can argue about why that is. Maybe when we view our home as cluttered, it causes us to perceive more stress than when we view it as restorative. Or maybe a restorative home really does help alleviate the effect of the day’s stressors. It could also be that there is an underlying variable that affects both our view of our home and our cortisol levels, such as frustration with gender roles, carrying the mental load, or a lack of self-efficacy (see point 8 below for more on that).
2 – Women are judged more harshly than men for clutter
There was a study in Sociological Methods & Research (actual study here, great breakdown here) that had participants rate how messy a room was, and judge the owner of the room. They saw the same photo, but some were told it was Jennifer’s room, and others were told it was John’s. Interestingly, “men and women respondents do not differ in their perceptions of how messy a room is or how urgent it is to clean it up. In contrast, the gender of the room occupant has strong and significant effects on housework perceptions, moral judgments, perceived social consequences, and allocations of responsibility. Notably, when a relatively clean room is evaluated, female room occupants are held to higher standards of cleanliness, are believed to suffer more negative social consequences when they do not meet those standards, and are generally deemed more responsible for housework across a variety of work–family arrangements than their male counterparts. […] Overall, findings underscore and refine the theory that gendered beliefs and accountability practices are a root cause of gendered behavior in the household.” So men and women perceived the same mess – it’s not that men don’t see the mess, it’s just that they are less to motivated to do anything about it. Also, women correctly perceive that they will be judge more harshly for being messy or having a cluttered home!
3 – Clutter takes up mental bandwidth
According to a Princeton study, “clutter restricts your brain’s ability to focus. It also limits your brain’s ability to process information. Clutter distracts you, saps your energy and keeps you from getting things done.” It also reduces working memory – that’s the one that temporarily holds needed for complex tasks like reasoning, comprehension, and problem-solving, or easier information like remembering a list of three things to do.
One theory as to why clutter takes up mental space is the Zeigarnik Effect: “the power of unfinished business or interrupted or uncompleted activity to hold a privileged place in memory. Unfinished tasks create a cognitive burden, weigh more heavily on the mind, and are more easily recalled than completed tasks.” Clutter being most often made up of items about which you haven’t made decisions yet (whether to keep it, where to store it, etc.), this makes sense. All those objects are competing for your attention!
Environmental/design psychologist Sally Augustin confirms, “The brain pulls from the sensory inputs it’s receiving at any given moment.” So yes, our space has a direct effect on how we feel,
how well we focus and rest, and our overall well-being. That same source also quotes therapist Annie Guest, saying “Well-organized living spaces reduce anxiety and promote calm” as well as creativity.
Reducing the number of decisions helps free up that mental space for things you actually want to do. In other words, reducing clutter gives your brain more energy – because it’s not just about stuff, it’s about the mental load as well.
4 – Clutter has a cumulative effect
We just talked about how clutter creates distractions – you see an object, and you think about where it came from, how it represents a task you have to do, it reminds you of something else, etc. When many objects are in your field of vision, they compete for your attention, which reduces your ability to get anything done.
This study went deeper. “What’s worse is that clutter has a cumulative effect on our brains - that is, the more you are exposed to clutter, the more distractible you become. Since your brain is naturally predisposed to favor order over chaos, constant visual disorganization tires the brain, impairs working memory, and makes it harder and harder to regain focus.” And remember how clutter increases cortisol? That creates stress and anxiety, and those impede learning as well.
Luckily, it turns out that decluttering really does help cure the problem, by boosting memory and focus. A study by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners showed that “the visual distraction of clutter increases cognitive overload and can reduce our working memory. In 2011, neuroscience researchers using fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) and other physiological measurements found clearing clutter from the home and work environment resulted in a better ability to focus and process information, as well as increased productivity.” There is also less mental fatigue with less clutter. So keep in mind that the benefits of a tidy work environment aren’t just subjective! It helps support your brain, your health, and your mood.
5 – Clutter negatively affects your health as well
Still quoting that study by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, “a chronically cluttered home environment can lead to a constant low-grade fight or flight response, taxing our resources designed for survival. This response can trigger physical and psychological changes that affect how we fight bugs and digest food, as well as leaving us at greater risk of type 2 diabetes and heart disease. (…) And surprisingly, it doesn’t go away when we finally get to bed. People who sleep in cluttered rooms are more likely to have sleep problems, including difficulty falling asleep and being disturbed during the night.”
We’ve also long known that there is a link between clutter and weight. “Multiple studies have found a link between clutter and poor eating choices. Disorganized and messy environments led participants in one study to eat more snacks, eating twice as many cookies than participants in an organized kitchen environment. Other research has shown that being in a messy room will make you twice as likely to eat a chocolate bar than an apple. Finally, people with extremely cluttered homes are 77% more likely to be overweight. Tidy homes have been found to be a predictor of physical health. Participants whose houses were cleaner were more active and had better physical health, according to another study.”
“Research does indeed show cluttered home environments negatively influence the perception of our homes, and ultimately our satisfaction of life.”
6 – Kids play more with fewer toys
A study in the Journal of Infant Behavior and Development showed that kids play twice as long, and in more creative ways, if they have fewer toys. “Playing in an environment with fewer toys and noise helps eliminate disruptions and may positively affect the neurodevelopment of attention skills, which are important to cognition as well as problem-solving, sequencing and communication skills. (…) Young children who play in environments with fewer toys tend to display sustained levels of attention, increased imagination, perception and cognition, and motor coordination.”
7 – Clutter makes your life go faster
Sounds crazy, right? It’s from a study in Nature Human Behaviour.
“We observe that scene size and memorability dilate time, whereas clutter contracts it.”
The researchers observed that when participants looked at a cluttered scene, they underestimated how much time had elapsed. This could mean that living in a cluttered home makes time seemingly go by faster, and feeling like your life is slipping away from you would also track with the perceived lack of autonomy exposed in point 8 below. Conversely, memorable scenes go by more slowly – we can live in the moment when we have quality time doing what we love, with the people we love.
8 – How many people are disorganized?
In the 2022 State of Organizing Report, a white paper published by MaxSold, a survey found that 43% of respondents feel disorganized, and for 69%, staying organized is a key challenge.
About 83% of respondents said that some areas of their home occasionally get disorganized, especially the kitchen and storage spaces, but most people do declutter them periodically. People who see themselves as organized were more likely to declutter promptly. Meanwhile, “disorganized people report worrying more that clutter means they are losing control, avoid decluttering for as long as possible, and only do what is necessary to get on with other tasks, when compared with organized people.”
From the 2022 MaxSold State of Organizing Report
From a behavioral psychology point of view, here are four fields of study related to professional organizing: a sense of home and psychological home; attachment to possessions; indecision and procrastination; and finally, well-being and positive psychology (how and why individuals flourish). Some people will be more affected by one aspect than others, but all of these show up in my sessions. It could be someone who feels at home because they are surrounded by objects they love; a mom who can’t let go of her older child’s baby clothes; a retiree who just doesn’t know where to start to tackle the clutter; or a young professional who values organizing because of how good it makes them feel to have a tidy home.
I presented place attachment as a positive thing, but it can become dysfunctional in a situation where someone has become too attached to a home that has become unsafe, or in a case of forced relocation. As for possession attachment, while it is perfectly normal to see items as extensions of ourselves, it can go too far. Clutter has negative impacts on people’s lives, creating tension between family members, social isolation, depression, and safety hazards. It also has a strong negative impact on feelings of security and comfort in our home. Let’s look at the next point to learn more.
9 - The dark side of home: Assessing possession “clutter” on subjective well-being
In this study, the authors showed that clutter can “undermine the comfortable everyday experience of ‘at home-ness’ people take for granted until clutter and disorganization erode their ability to find things, move safely throughout their home, and use spaces as intended.” So having too much stuff can get in the way of everyday activities, like cooking, cleaning, or even moving safely through the home. Clutter absolutely has a negative impact on our enjoyment of home and our subjective well-being. It can “create disconnectedness from important dimensions of at-homeness.”
The thing is that our possessions are a big component of our identity. “Possessions are used to distinguish self from environment, distinguish self from others, manage changes to identities, and as one ages, promote a sense of continuity across the life span. […] Attachments to material objects solidify not only the interconnection between self and objects, but also between self and home.” Our possessions help us create, express and remember who we are; they make our house a home. As we get older, then, our attachment to our possessions might deepen, which would make leaving home even more distressing. We know that “allowing older people to take cherished objects with them to new residential settings contributed to their sense of connection to cherished memories and relieved stress associated with having to part from familiar home spaces.”
But “these normal possession meanings, if taken to extreme, can become maladaptive, especially when clutter accumulates to a point in which it threatens to interfere with daily life functions within home environments.” Among participants to the study, a common theme was feeling “engulfed” and “overwhelmed” by the clutter around them; they felt “trapped.” The researchers found that “clutter is often an insidious and seemingly harmless outgrowth of people's natural desire to appropriate their personal spaces with possessions that reflect self-identity and remind them of important people, places, and experiences in their lives. However, when clutter becomes excessive, it can threaten to physically and psychologically entrap a person in dysfunctional home environments which contribute to personal distress and feelings of displacement and alienation. [The] findings revealed negative impacts of clutter on a person's life (e.g., tension between family members, social isolation, depression, and safety hazards) can detract from the normally positive benefits of psychological home and exert a direct negative impact on subjective well-being.”
Another interesting point to me is that there are “five positive dimensions of at-homeness that can become replaced by negative dimensions when home environments are compromised. These dimensions are: 1) rootedness, or the ability to conduct normal routines, replaced with disconnectedness, including bodily discomfort, loss of mobility and accessibility; 2) appropriation, or feelings of autonomy and control, replaced with imposition, loss of autonomy, or dependence on external assistance; 3) at-easeness replaced with uneaseness, when residents' life worlds are called into question by personal, social, or environmental elements; 4) regeneration, or the restorative powers of home, replaced with degeneration, or disruptions caused by personal, social, or environmental changes; and 5) warmth replaced with coldness, when the ‘spirit’ of home devolves into raw material space.” I think this is important because it lets us know which aspects of at-homeness are most important, and why, which makes it easier to create a home that is more welcoming to us.
10 – Procrastination and clutter
Another study showed that tendencies such as delaying and avoiding unpleasant tasks (like decluttering) can culminate in one’s lifetime, and clutter leads to reduced quality of life, satisfaction with life, and negative self-image. While everyday forms of procrastination lead to everyday forms of clutter, as one ages, chronic procrastination and clutter can lead to not-so-average kinds of distress and identity, impacting well-being. This means that older adults are particularly negatively affected by their clutter! Chronic procrastination is also correlated with personality variables like low self-confidence and self-esteem; increased depression, neurosis, self-consciousness, and anxiety; and forgetfulness as well as maladaptive disorganization. This is not to say that procrastination is causing this, but that it, and clutter, are correlated with these negative outcomes. Procrastination is essentially making yourself feel better in the moment (by delaying when you tackle the difficult thing), but it does not help you in the long term.
11 – Materialism and well-being
A new study published in 2020 examined this link. Studies have consistently shown a link between materialism and lower levels of personal well-being (including life satisfaction, family relationships, and leisure). That is because you cannot meet the psychological needs of autonomy, competence, relatedness, mental space, and awareness by buying more stuff! People who adopted a minimalistic lifestyle reported a feeling of freedom and liberation: “not only from their possessions, but from societal expectations; from the monotony of routine; and from the trap of the hedonic treadmill” (the endless cycle of buying something and expecting it to make you feel better). They also reported saving time, mostly from not having to clean or organize so much.
All this allowed minimalistic participants in that study to align their actions with their values and authentic selves: spending more quality time with their family and friends, spending money on experiences rather than possessions, being more ecofriendly, not being tied to a boring routine, etc. When they did buy something, it was a thought-out purchase that added joy or value to their life.
Minimalism provided a sense of control and ownership of their environment, as well as the ability to maintain control. “Almost all participants conveyed the belief that what is happening in one’s physical space (the external world) is reflected in one’s mental space (the internal world) and vice versa.” It also provided competence, for example by allowing people to easily find what they were looking for, or fixing broken items instead of buying new ones.
“Many participants identified the idea of saving ‘mental energy’ as a benefit of minimalism that promotes well-being. Participants reported this was due to having fewer choices to make and not preoccupying the mind with trivial matters. It’s almost like saving your brain energy by reducing the things that you have to actually think about.” The researchers noted that cluttered homes and classrooms could therefore be detrimental to attention, cognition, and learning.
Participants reported a heightened awareness, and enhanced reflection, mindfulness, and savoring as a result of minimalism. One said, “I would much rather buy something that’s really nice and well-made that I can appreciate and savor and just have one of those rather than have lots of things that are kind of a bit cheap that I don’t really engage with.”
“In addition to the absence of stress and anxiety, all participants reported that their minimalistic lifestyle was a catalyst for positive emotions, in particular joy and peacefulness. Positive emotions appeared to stem from the other benefits of minimalism: autonomy, competence, mental space, and awareness.” One said, “I’m just not the same person I used to be… I’m very peaceful and calm and very happy.” Another said, “A lot calmer. Definitely a lot calmer.”
It could be that clutter had a direct effect on participants’ well-being, or it could be that feeling more autonomous, aware, or competent as they cleared the clutter made them happier. Either way, the benefits of decluttering are undeniable!
Hi there! I’m Amélie, a professional home organizer in San Antonio, Texas. I help people like you declutter their home, organize their belongings, and simplify their life. I love cleaning out a closet and removing a carload of donations from a home! My goal is to help you create a functional space that will make your life easier and more peaceful.
Interested? Check out my personalized services or book your complimentary consultation!
Simplify
You know how there are some concepts that seem obvious if you’re very familiar with them, but to someone else, those concepts are not at all clear? I’ve had that experience recently when saying “less is more” and I was reminded that some things need explaining. I am going to use some client examples in this post, and I want to make it *abundantly clear* that I would never shame anyone; I am using these examples precisely because *they are so relatable*.
Some people have a lot of clothes. So many clothes that the baskets never empty, the clothes never all get put away, and there are always piles of stuff in the laundry room. Most often, these people feel overwhelmed by their laundry. And all too often, their reasoning is that since they have so much trouble finding clean clothes and putting together an outfit each day, the solution must be that they need *more* clothes. They are very taken aback when I tell them that the solution is actually that they need to *get rid of* a lot of clothes!
The shortest, least complicated way to get dressed is to have fewer options in our closet.
Shannon Leyko
Let’s take the example of socks. I worked with a not-atypical client who had three drawers full of socks in her closet, plus a few bins of orphaned socks elsewhere in the house. The drawers had the intention of order (lights, darks, and hosiery), but everything was pell-mell inside them, and there were many orphaned socks and strays in the wrong places, along with some mismatched socks paired together out of desperation. They had taken over too much space and were a thorn in my client’s side each day because it was so hard for her to find what she wanted!
Now, how many socks does one person need? It depends. I mean, I would say that since there are different seasons, it is absolutely appropriate to have wool socks that you only wear in the winter and cotton socks for the summer. Life also presents different types of occasions, so sure, you might need knee-high stockings, black dress socks, white crew socks, ankle sports socks, and a pair of ugly Christmas socks thrown in for good measure. I’m all for variety!
Here’s what happened with this client: Even when I pointed out socks with holes or stains, my client did not want to get rid of them or thought she would need to replace them, because she was in a scarcity mindset. The remedy was easy, if a bit tedious: sort through all the socks, pair them up properly, then organize them by type/length/color. From that point on, not only were they easy to find, but she could see what she had at a glance! At the beginning of the session, she was afraid that she couldn’t get rid of any knee-high stockings, and that was because she genuinely couldn’t always find a pair when she needed one. But once we were done, she had enough to wear a different pair every day for almost three weeks if she had wanted to, and that is when she was able to let go of the excess.
Order allowed her to simplify, and simplifying made her life easier.
Let’s use another example inspired by a different client. Imagine doing a load of laundry and ending up with (among other things) 43 socks; after putting some order in things, you determine that you have 11 orphans and 16 pairs, each of them different. Now imagine instead doing a load of laundry and ending up with 14 socks, comprised of 7 pairs, 5 of which are identical. Isn’t sorting (and putting away) the second load so much easier? The way you get there is by having fewer socks, doing a load every week, and buying bundles of identical pairs whenever possible. David Tennant gets it!
And when this client realized that even if we did match all the orphaned socks that had accumulated, the drawer wasn’t spacious enough for them, her reaction was to say that she would need to purchase more storage. And I said that actually, her storage was fine, it was just that she had too many socks! It just felt like it wasn’t enough because they didn’t get put away properly once they were clean, and again, that’s easier to do with fewer socks.
Because here’s the thing: The fewer items you have to manage, the less energy it will take from you – and therefore the more energy you have for important things. You can pare down to the essentials, switch to only one sock color, limit the number of special-occasion socks, and simplify both your closet and your life.
By the way, it’s easier to keep up than it is to catch up. That’s why clients hire me to help them catch up – then they are set up for success!
Here are some tips for success: It’s not about how many socks you can fit in your space or how many you could afford to buy; it’s about how many will make your life more manageable. To translate this more broadly, build a system that meets you where you are today. Which routines feel easy? Which routines (or spaces) do not serve you? What drains you and what would you need to feel better about it?
Hi there! I’m Amélie, a professional home organizer in San Antonio, Texas. I help people like you declutter their home, organize their belongings, and simplify their life. I love cleaning out a closet and removing a carload of donations from a home! My goal is to help you create a functional space that will make your life easier and more peaceful.
Interested? Check out my personalized services or book your complimentary consultation!
Do we really have 300,000 items in our homes?
You’ve probably heard that number being floated around: the average household contains 300,000 items. But does it really? It turns out I have a bit of inside information, as well as some thoughts, so here we go!
That number actually comes from a NAPO colleague of mine, Regina Lark, who was quoted in the LA Times in 2014 saying that the average house contains 300,000 items. I attended one of her webinars last month, where she explained that when asked, she said that she got the number from the UCLA’s 2012 book Life at Home in the Twenty-First Century – which I happened to be reading at the time! And then, try as she might, she was never able to find that reference, although she is convinced that she did read that number somewhere and did not make it up. I also could have sworn that it was in that book, but when I looked for it, I couldn’t find that figure either. However, her quote has since taken on a life of its own and is, to this day, being repeated everywhere as truth, probably because the LA Times is an important publication.
So, the book was published after UCLA conducted a great anthropological study with 32 American families in 2012, and they talk a lot about their methodology. They did count objects, but it was more of an estimate: they made educated guesses about certain groups of items, and they only ever counted items in plain sight – meaning that anything that would have been in a drawer, in a cabinet, or behind something visible was not counted. Here are some figures from that study, along with a quote that will not surprise you: “Middle-class America has the most possessions per family in history.” Households surveyed had an average of 438 books and magazines, 139 toys, and 39 pairs of shoes per family (again, these are only visible items). In home offices, the lowest number of plainly visible non-paper objects was 21, and the most was 2,337. In the garage, it ranged from 50 to 650. Having more items on one’s refrigerator (magnets, papers, etc.) was correlated with having more objects in the home. But there is no total anywhere in sight!
Now, here’s where my opinion comes into play. Let’s be generous by rounding up and saying that a person lives for 30,000 days. From those days, we wouldn’t really count childhood, so there’s maybe 25,000 days left? Let’s say the average household has two adults, and they are acquiring objects not just for themselves, but also for their 2.5 kids. Okay. So with my rough mathematical model here, those adults would have to acquire (while never discarding!) about 12 items each day in order to have 300,000 by the end of their life, right? So it would have to be an even faster rate of acquisition in order to have that many items while their kids are still living with them, as in the UCLA study. I’m not counting perishable items like groceries or cleaning products in this tally, and I wouldn’t be counting every last piece of paper either, since the UCLA anthropologists didn’t.
Speaking for my household, we are not acquiring items at nearly that rate. Sure, there are isolated times when I will buy a lot at once. For example, in one shopping spree, I could buy several outfits for my kids to go back to school as they grow, along with school supplies. But on an average day, I am not buying anything. And regardless of how much I buy, I do get rid of some items along the way (like the kids’ clothes that have been outgrown, plus the school supplies that get used up).
All this to say that while I do not have any idea how many items are in my household, and while I’m sure the number would seem very large if I were to learn it, I don’t think it’s anywhere close to 300,000!
Hi there! I’m Amélie, a professional home organizer in San Antonio, Texas. I help people like you declutter their home, organize their belongings, and simplify their life. I love cleaning out a closet and removing a carload of donations from a home! My goal is to help you create a functional space that will make your life easier and more peaceful.
Interested? Check out my personalized services or book your complimentary consultation!
Minimalism, Marie Kondo, and The Home Edit
My last post was about minimalism, and today I want to elaborate on the relationship between minimalism and Marie Kondo as well as compare it to The Home Edit.
I remember that when Marie Kondo opened her online shop (initially selling household objects and with broader offerings now), many people criticized her for “selling out.” I believe that those critics did not understand her philosophy. You see, the goal of the KonMari Method™ is not to get rid of as many objects as possible, but to mindfully choose which objects to keep.
One of the first steps of a tidying festival is to imagine your ideal lifestyle; this might look different for everyone, and some people will definitely be more comfortable keeping most of their belongings. The thing to keep in mind is that you should be surrounding yourself with only objects that you love (which is where the carefully curated objects in her store come in, if they speak to you). In practice, this means that many people will realize along the way that they had been keeping objects that they did not love or which did not serve them, and so they will discard those objects and end up with much more curated belongings. This can overlap with minimalism, but it is not the case for everyone.
Marie Kondo’s official website maintains that KonMari is not minimalism. That being said, if I go back to Joshua Becker’s definition, minimalism being “the intentional pursuit of the things we value the most and the removal of anything that distracts us,” I feel like Marie Kondo’s philosophy is indeed compatible with minimalism (though, again, not asceticism).
I want to make a quick comparison here to Clea Shearer and Joanna Teplin of The Home Edit. To simplify, their method is based on the appeal of a ROYGBV aesthetic as well as, ideally, the purchase of certain objects sold by the organizers (either directly from their website, or through their exclusive collection at the Container Store). It is also premised on having a LOT of backstock – and therefore enough room to store it! Their Netflix show, Get Organized with The Home Edit, was advertising all that product, whereas Tidying Up with Marie Kondo was all about using organizing products you already have on hand. The KonMari reveals were much less spectacular – more down-to-earth, if you will.
Critics also like to talk about the wastefulness of the KonMari Method™, what with all the “discarding,” but again I have to say that I disagree. While there can be a substantial quantity of items donated (those in good condition) and trashed or recycled (expired makeup, papers that are no longer useful, etc.), I would argue that the KonMari Method™ did not create those items. It merely moved them from their temporary, cumbersome place in your home to a more appropriate place – the problem really began when useless objects were manufactured (before they were even purchased!), and this has to do with our consumerist culture. The KonMari Method™ actually encourages mindfully acquiring new objects, thereby reducing the likelihood of buying useless things in the future.
Meanwhile, on the second episode of Get Organized with The Home Edit, Clea Shearer and Joanna Teplin were in Rachel Zoe’s closet – which they had ALREADY organized over a year prior and were just touching up – and they dealt with it by… relocating some items to her off-site storage space AND adding storage to the closet. So, certainly not a minimalist approach! I mean, I understand that Rachel Zoe is a fashion designer and needs to keep certain items for reference, but in my opinion, those should be archived in a warehouse or something, not in her personal closet. She’ll need to deal with it at some point, like after the next few seasons’ worth of designs come into her space.
I really enjoyed this Refinery 29 article comparing Marie Kondo and The Home Edit. This quote jumped out at me: “But if Kondo’s method elevates objects in a uniquely Japanese way [based on Shintoism], allowing us to consider and value them, The Home Edit elevates objects in a uniquely American way: by putting them on display. Here, of course, is where the product is necessary. Our many things, from Clorox wipes to designer purses, go on display. Their closets and drawers and pantries become their own sort of shrine to consumption.”
That being said, Marie Kondo will be joining in on the fun! Next month, the Container Store will be launching her line of sustainably sourced products. I can’t wait to see what they look like!
If you are interested in either method (KonMari or The Home Edit), be sure to get in touch!